Skip to content

Conversation

@nsoranzo
Copy link
Member

Extracted the uncontroversial changes from #19112 .

How to test the changes?

(Select all options that apply)

  • I've included appropriate automated tests.
  • This is a refactoring of components with existing test coverage.
  • Instructions for manual testing are as follows:
    1. [add testing steps and prerequisites here if you didn't write automated tests covering all your changes]

License

  • I agree to license these and all my past contributions to the core galaxy codebase under the MIT license.

…th_metadata_options_filter`` API tests

Duplicates of `lib/galaxy_test/api/test_tool_execute.py::test_deferred_basic`
and ``lib/galaxy_test/api/test_tool_execute.py::test_deferred_with_metadata_options_filter``
respectively.
Copy link
Member

@mvdbeek mvdbeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!


@property
def execute(self) -> "DescribeToolExecution":
execution = DescribeToolExecution(self._dataset_populator, self._tool_id)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not entirely uncontroversial. I loved how the old call lines were so optimized and legible. I'd rather have a property execute_with_job_cache to match execute. I'll admit a property that changes state is a Python anti-pattern though.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for reviewing! I don't feel having to add () makes it less legible, but I do agree on the second part :)

@nsoranzo nsoranzo merged commit 64d5c22 into galaxyproject:dev Jan 27, 2026
61 of 63 checks passed
@nsoranzo nsoranzo deleted the 19112_redux branch January 27, 2026 19:39
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR was merged without a "kind/" label, please correct.

@nsoranzo nsoranzo added kind/enhancement kind/refactoring cleanup or refactoring of existing code, no functional changes labels Jan 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/testing/api area/testing kind/enhancement kind/refactoring cleanup or refactoring of existing code, no functional changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants